‘Where are AMD’s scholars?’

    

►

Brethren of the Allied Masonic Degrees have received the latest Allied Times newsletter, which contains all kinds of information on recent and upcoming events, including Masonic Week. Also of note is a message from the chairman of Grand Council’s Publications Committee concerning the upcoming edition of Miscellanea.

This, ideally, is the annual book of quality papers written by AMD Masons around the country and presented in their local councils. Looks like we’re getting a “best of” anthology of classics this year. Too little new material is being submitted by the council secretaries (or maybe submissions received aren’t that great) to fill the pages of a quality book, so most of this new volume comes from the past. Here’s the table of contents:

▪︎ 1939-1941: “The Union Degree,” by Wendell K. Walker

▪︎ 1939-1941: “Evolution of the Tracing Board,” by S. Clifton Bingham

▪︎ 1949: “Light From The Forty-Seventh Problem of Euclid,” by J. Edward Allen

▪︎ 1950: “Group Masonic Research,” by William Mosley Brown

▪︎ 1954: “Freemasonry Past, Present, and Future,” by William A. Thaanum

▪︎ 1981: “The Itinerant Degree Peddlers,” by S. Marshall Sanders, Jr.

▪︎ 1991: “Ray Shute and the A.M.D.,” by Keith Arrington

▪︎ 2024: “What Come You Here to Do?,” by Robert G. Davis

▪︎ 2024: “Forward of Freemasonry and the Marquis de Lafayette’s 1824-1825 American Tour,” by B. Chris Ruli

Papers in AMD need not meet the same requirements one finds in research lodges. For starters, these do not have to be research papers, but rather information of “Masonic interest” is how I think the rule phrases it. The requirements aren’t at all rigorous, so standards in length, style, and content shouldn’t prevent everyone from participating. Naturally, not everyone is destined for this kind of work. AMD also needs ritualists, administrators, and organizers, but there ought to be someone writing the educational content of meetings.

This brings me to my principal gripe about Grand Council: It charters constituent councils too generously. The proof of this, in part, is seen in how practically no one in the country gets published in Miscellanea. I’m not sure if Charter No. 600 has been issued yet, but it’s close. Where are all the Masonic scholars in all these councils?

It took Grand Council almost forty years to issue Charter No. 83 in 1971 (to my council), but in the past fifty-three years it has cranked out more than 500? Fifty-three years when the Masonic population in the United States dropped from more than three million to 800,000? How does that make sense?

It doesn’t, of course, because AMD was meant to be small. It is not open to Master Masons; one must be a Royal Arch Mason, which precludes about 90 percent of Master Masons from joining. And one does not petition; one is invited into a council. And we cannot invite too many because each council is constitutionally capped at twenty-seven members.

Get it? It’s supposed to be a small, even elite, fraternity. One of the codgers who was still around when I was brought in twenty-three years ago called it the Ph.D. level of Freemasonry.

So, now that the Allied Masonic Degrees in the United States is supersized, where are all the writers? (Why am I not writing for Miscellanea is the obvious question, and my answer is complicated, but I do have reasons.)

To have your work published in Miscellanea, give the paper to your council secretary, and he will forward it to the Publications Committee.

UPDATE—October 30: Okay, a friend back channel called bullshit on my “reasons,” so I’ll share one here: Where are the dozens of Grand Council officers in this? If, say, eight of them submitted papers each year, we’d get a book. They all were appointed to their glamorous positions meritoriously, and there was no tedious cronyism at work, so what gives?