‘Our “cult of the Enlightenment”’

    

Historia Ecclesiastica

Can you imagine going through life thinking the Enlightenment was a period of darkness? That must be like having a perpetual headache. I picture a Gumby from Monty Python. Yet this is the psychology revealed, without any hesitation, mental reservation, etc. on YouTube’s Historia Ecclesiastica channel, which lately has been commenting on Freemasonry in the same exasperating way and manner we would expect from those blinded by their dogma.

Python (Monty) Pictures

From the podcast’s name, we can deduce Historia Ecclesiastica purports to present the history of the Roman Catholic Church (I’ll guess the title comes from Eusebius), but without watching all of its videos, I am going to surmise that it, in fact, does not candidly explore the entire history of the Church. And I’ll let that go at that.

Historia Ecclesiastica

On Freemasonry, the allegations in one slog of a video are formed by the usual sloppy errors and ignorance, but with this difference: Supposedly there is something called “The Alta Vendita” that host Daniel Sute claims is some kind of movement of Freemasons working toward “the final destruction of Catholicism and even of the Christian idea.” Have you ever heard of this? I’ve never heard of it, and I’ve been reading and writing about Freemasonry with some regularity for more than a quarter of a century. That doesn’t mean I know everything about Freemasonry, but if there existed a Masonic plot to destroy Catholicism and all Christianity, I think I might have heard of it by now. Yes, I checked my spam folder. Besides, there are fewer than two million Freemasons in the world versus one billion Catholics, so I think they’re safe. (You neo-Templars out there should pay attention to this.)

Here are several of the lame mistakes Sute provides his gullible audience:

✔︎ He thinks stonemason guilds of medieval times were bricklayers. He has no understanding of ashlar masonry and consequently does not know Freemasonry’s moral building metaphor based on the squaring of stones. Without this most basic grasp of what Freemasonry is about, he is unqualified to run his mouth about us.

✔︎ He repeatedly says Freemasonry is a religion. He ignores the overall purpose of post-1717 Freemasonry is to unite men of all kinds of religious backgrounds which, in 1717, was a completely new idea in the West. And everywhere else.

✔︎ He can’t even pronounce “Augustine,” mistakenly saying it the way one gives the name of the Florida city! He cannot pronounce “Desaguliers,” but I’ll grant him that.

✔︎ He mistakes “affront” for “a front.”

✔︎ In discussing “Jewish world domination,” which he graciously concedes is without evidence, he gives the title of the notorious book as “Protocols of the Elder Zion.”

William Blake’s The Ancient of Days is the frontispiece of his book Europe, a Prophecy from 1794. The British Museum says it depicts ‘a bearded nude male (probably Urizen) crouching in a heavenly sphere, its light partially covered by clouds; his left arm holding a pair of compasses and reaching down with them, measuring the surrounding darkness.’

✔︎ Very stupidly, he displays William Blake’s The Ancient of Days, and says it is “kind of a disturbing image—a weird image—this is a Masonic depiction of their vision of god.”

✔︎ He thinks Albert Mackey’s name is “Mackley” and Manly Hall’s name is “Manley.”

✔︎ He says “lodges typically have thirty-three degrees.” He calls the Royal Arch Degree the “Royal Arch Decree.”

✔︎ He mispronounces “Weishaupt” as something like “wash up,” but I’ll grant him that one too.

✔︎ He—yawn—dredges up the old Pike/Lucifer thing.

Decades ago in journalism, I was told—and it was said only once—that if you cannot get names correct, then your reader has no reason to trust anything else you say. This is something Mr. Sute needs to understand. He is a fifth grade teacher at Our Lady of Sorrows Catholic School in Farmington, Michigan, and he probably should stick to that. He can propagandize ten-year-olds with impunity, but showing off to the public his ignorance and inability to undertake basic research does him no favors. Then again, reading the comments on this video reveals who his audience is.

His real failure is evident in “The Greatest Danger of the Freemasons,” where the biggest canard in a one-hour clown show is Sute’s citing of the Carbonari as a Masonic group. It is in the final minutes that Alta Vendita finally is addressed. What was the Carbonari? Writing in 1908 as chairman of the Grand Lodge of Canada in the Province of Ontario’s Correspondence Committee, MW Henry Robertson, who had served as Grand Master in 1886-88, explains:

While there is no doubt that societies of the same name existed in Europe in the eighteenth century, the Carbonari proper first came into prominence about the year 1808. The Carbonari (Italian: Carbonaro, charcoal maker) had no direct connection with Masonry, but a large number of its forms were borrowed from that source. It was in Italy, toward the close of the Napoleonic wars, that this society first began to assume importance. In 1808, the Republicans, disgusted alike with the Bourbons and Napoleonists, retired to the mountain resorts of the Abruzzi and Calabria. In this latter region, charcoal burning was the chief industry of the poorer classes, and these Republicans, forming themselves into a secret society, borrowed their phraseology in numerous instances. Thus a lodge was called a baracca (a hut), an ordinary meeting a vendita (or sale), while an important meeting was alta vendita, all well known terms in the charcoal burning industry. The Carbonari were Christian, but anti-Papal, and borrowed their rites from that religion; thus Christ the Lamb, as the victim of tyranny, put to death by the wolf, gave them their watchword. There were four grades of the Carbonari, with Alta Vendita at Naples and Salermo. These two latter lodges tried to exercise authority over the rest, but failed in their efforts.

Coaxed to join the Bourbons, the Carbonari were driven back to their mountain fastnesses by King Murat, and their leader, Capobianco, was treacherously betrayed and put to death. A few years later they helped to overthrow the French power in Naples, but Ferdinand, when once in power, proved false to them and refused them permission to establish their lodges in Naples, as they had previously done in Sicily under English supremacy. Enraged at this treachery, they conspired against the Bourbon Government, and rapidly formed lodges all over Italy. They were the prime movers in several rebellions that took place about this time. The Neapolitan revolution of 1820, the disturbances in the Papal States the same year, and the Piedmontese revolution in 1821 can all be traced to them. Originally composed of members of the lower classes, about this time they obtained thousands of recruits from all classes of society. Army officers, students, artists, and even priests flocked to their standard, and their numbers are said to have reached 700,000. So strong did they become that, at last, Austria became alarmed and the military power of this nation was called in to crush them. Though still remaining active until 1831, they never fully recovered from this setback, and most of their numbers were swallowed up by the society of “Young Italy,” founded by Mazzini.

In 1820, the Carbonari took root in France, where their organization was much more perfect. A Supreme Council, presided over by the great Lafayette, and a complete hierarchy of societies, by which the will of the Chief was handed on from the highest to the most remote lodge. Attempting to raise an insurrection in 1821 at Belfort, LaRochelle, and other places, they were promptly suppressed and suffered terribly, but owing to the wonderful fidelity of the members, only those immediately connected with the revolution could be punished. The Carbonari still continued to take an active part in all revolutionary matters till 1831, when, after helping in the July revolution of that year, the majority of its members associated themselves with the government of Louis Philippe. Dating from this time the society became practically extinct.

So you see why the Catholic Church wouldn’t like the Carbonari, but to claim the Carbonari is Freemasonry and to blame Freemasonry today for what the Carbonari thought, said, and did two centuries ago is a totalitarian method of accusing and convicting.

Python (Monty) Pictures

I guess we should expect the Spanish Inquisition.

He calls on Freemasonry to end its secrecy by disclosing to the public all of its rituals and meeting minutes. Sure thing. Right after the Vatican does likewise.

Actually, Mr. Sute, I don’t like the idea of you teaching young children (or anyone else). You are an ignoramus, and your contrived libels against Freemasonry work only on your fellow idiots. I’d recommend authors like Joseph Fort Newton and Carl Claudy to you, but you wear blinders on your brain, which is what fanaticism is all about.

Historia Ecclesiastica

To his credit, Sute does state that Freemasonry is not Christian. Freemasonry is not aligned with any religion (except the Scandinavian grand lodges, which have a different idea).

His other videos include “How Modern Art Caused World War I” and “Mother Was a Red.”